In interpreting practice, which scenario might require the use of first-person interpreting?

First-person interpreting refers to the practice where the interpreter conveys the message as if they are speaking directly to the other person, using the first-person perspective. This approach enhances clarity and creates a more natural flow in communication, helping to establish rapport between parties.

In the scenario where there are multiple speakers, using first-person interpreting can help keep the interactions clear and direct. The interpreter can relay what each speaker says in a manner that feels immediate and personal, minimizing the confusion that might arise when conveying multiple perspectives through a third-person lens.

When interpreting for intoxicated individuals, there can be challenges in communication due to potential misunderstandings or impaired judgment. First-person interpreting can help maintain a clearer line of communication, allowing the interpreter to present messages directly as they are intended, thereby ensuring that the challenging context does not lead to further miscommunication.

Thus, the need for first-person interpreting arises in both scenarios described, making the correct answer one that acknowledges the importance of this interpretive approach in varied contexts.